Friends
of the Earth preparing legal action against approval of UK state aid for
nuclear power plant
The European Commission today
decided that the UK's funding of Électricité de France (EdF) to
build Hinkley Point C, a nuclear power station in Somerset, was not in breach
of state aid rules. This decision by the out-going Commission, just weeks before
its term ends on 31 October, seemingly contradicts the Commission´s own
assessments of the situation on 7 March this year. At the time, the
Commission stated that: "...the measure does not involve a genuine Service
of General Economic Interest and favours an undertaking selectively,
threatening to distort competition and affect trade between Member States"
and "The Commission also has serious doubts on the need for State aid in
relation to nuclear energy".
The European Commission's
decision will likely face multiple legal challenges, according to Patricia
Lorenz, nuclear campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe: "The outgoing
Commission's intention to give this huge gift to EdF is not the end of the
story. Civil society organisations, European national governments and
competitors in the electricity market have already announced they will take
legal action against this decision to guarantee 35 years of feed-in price for
nuclear power."
Friends of the Earth Europe's
Austrian member group, Global 2000, has consulted with lawyers to gain an
overview over possible legal action and plan to challenge this decision by the
European Commission in the European Court of Justice under the Commission's own
Aarhus Regulation.
Commenting on the European
Commission's decision, Reinhard Uhrig, nuclear campaigner for Friends of the
Earth Austria / Global 2000 said: "In March 2013, the Commission severely
interfered with member states' ability to support renewable energy production, and
now they sit and watch while nuclear is saved with €19 billion. Their state aid guidelines on renewable energy force
national governments to drastically cut their support. At a time
when we urgently need to create space for a people-centered sustainable energy
transition, we instead see decisions that will lock us into a dirty and
dangerous energy future. This is why we are determined to make a strong legal
challenge to this reckless and unfair decision."