Brussels, 10
February, 2009 - On the eve of the release of annual industry-sponsored
figures, a new report released today by Friends of the Earth International
reveals the failure of genetically modified crops around the world, and how
statistics showing their increase in Europe have been manipulated. [1]
The new 'Who Benefits
from GM Crops?' 2009 report [2] exposes inconsistencies in how the European
biotech lobby group EuropaBio has reported the total area planted to GM crops.
[3] The group inflated the figures by almost a quarter in 2008 to mask an
actual decline.
The misleading numbers are used by companies to make genetically modified
farming appear more widespread than it really is. In reality public opposition
and safety-conscious European governments mean that planting of GM crops in Europe has decreased every year since 2005 with an overall drop of 35 per cent. [4]
Helen Holder, European GMO campaign coordinator for Friends of the
Earth, said: "Global acceptance of GM crops would mean
big bucks for an industry that profits from royalties for patented seeds and
pesticides, but Europe has resisted GM food and crops for more than ten years.
"The biotech industry is resorting to lies in its attempt to force its
products onto the public. It’s time for them to stop the spin and face the
failure of GM in Europe.
"GM crops are grown in a very small surface area worldwide, and only
significantly in countries targeting the markets of richer nations. As has now
been recognised internationally, they do not benefit small-scale farmers or
contribute to poverty reduction."
The cultivation of GMOs remains a fraction of agriculture, with GM maize, the
only GM crop approved, constituting a mere 0.21 per cent of agricultural land
in the European Union [5]. Globally, GM crops are still confined to a handful
of countries with highly industrialised, export-oriented agricultural sectors.
Nearly 90 per cent of the area planted to GM crops in 2007 was found in just
six countries in North and South America, with 80 per cent in the US, Argentina
and Brazil. One country alone, the United States, plants over 50 per cent of
the world's GM crops. Just 3 per cent or less of cropland in India and China is planted to GM crops. [6]
Friends of the Earth International's report exposes how even as populations
around the world are hit by rising prices of basic food, biotech corporations
are reporting record profits by increasing prices of GM seeds and pesticides
exponentially. Farmers are being squeezed at a time when the number of people
around the world facing hunger is reaching 1 billion. [7]
Despite much pro-GM hype built up by the industry during the food crisis, there
is still not a single commercial GM crop with increased yield,
drought-tolerance, salt-tolerance, enhanced nutrition or other ‘beneficial’
traits long promised by biotech companies. [8]
Official data from major producer countries – US, Argentina and Brazil – confirms that pesticide use increases with GM crops, including the use of toxic
chemicals banned in some European countries. This causes massive increases in
costs for farmers as well as agronomic, environmental and health problems,
mostly affecting poor communities who live near intensive GM farms. [9]
***
For
more information, please contact:
Helen
Holder, Coordinator of tthe Friends of the Earth Europe GMOs campaign:
Tel: +32 2542 6182 and +32 474 857638 (Belgian mobile)
Francesca
Gater, Communications Officer for Friends of the Earth Europe:
Tel: +32 2542 6105 and +32 485 930515 (Belgian mobile)
***
NOTES
TO EDITORS:
[1] The Friends of the Earth International report launch comes one day ahead of
the annual release of the 'Global Status of Commercialized Biotech' report of
the industry-sponsored International Service for the Acquisition of
Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) - which promotes GM crops as a key solution
to hunger and poverty.
[2] 'Who Benefits’ from GM crops?: Feeding the biotech giants, not the world’s
poor' from Friends of the Earth International.
Executive Summary
Full report
EU briefing
Critique on ISAAA's inflated GM crop data
[3] http://www.europabio.org/documents/2008%20Cultivation%20chart.pdf
The European biotech lobby association dropped France – which banned GM crop
cultivation in 2008 - from its caluations so that an overall increase was
shown rather than the actual decrease caused by the French ban.
[4] Crops have been grown in seven European countries – Czech Republic, France (stopped in 2008), Germany, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Romania. See EU briefing
[5] 4 ISAAA, 2008. www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/37/pptslides/default.html as reported
in http://www.gmfreeze.org/uploads/GM_crops_land_area_final.pdf
[6] 'Who Benefits’ from GM crops: Feeding the biotech giants, not the world's
poor' Friends of the Earth International. See note [2]
[7] Monsanto is the world’s largest seed firm and holds a near monopoly in the
market for GM seeds. It also markets Roundup, the world’s biggest-selling
herbicide, to be used in conjunction with its ‘RoundupReady seeds’. Goldman
Sachs recently projected Monsanto’s total revenue increasing 74% from 2007 to
2010 (from $8.6 to $14.9 billion). The average price for soybean seed, the
largest GM crop in the US has risen by more than 50% in just two years from
2006 to 2008 – from $32.30 to $49.23 per planted acre. The price of Monsanto’s
triple-stack corn will reportedly increase by $95-100 per bag, to top $300 per
bag in 2009. Retail prices for Roundup herbicide have increased from just $32
per gallon in December 2006 to $45 per gallon a year later, to $75 per gallon
by June 2008 –a 134% price hike in less than two years. Monsanto controls
roughly 60% of the market for glyphosate (the active ingredient of Roundup).
[8] The biotech industry has still not introduced a single GM crop that has
enhanced nutrition, higher yield potential, drought-tolerance, salt-tolerance,
or other promised traits. As before, biotech agriculture consists of four crops
with just two traits, herbicide-tolerance and/or insect-resistance. Of the 12 GM crops awaiting USDA commercial approval, nearly half (5) are herbicide-tolerant. Two (corn and
soybeans) have dual herbicide-tolerance, while three others are tolerant to a
single herbicide (cotton, alfalfa and golf-course grass). None of the others
represent beneficial new traits. Three varieties of insect-resistant (IR)
corn (2) and cotton (1) are minor variations on existing IR crops.
Virus-resistant papaya and soybeans with altered oil content are already
approved, though not grown to any significant extent. Carnations engineered for
altered colour are a trivial application of biotechnology. Finally, corn
engineered to contain a novel enzyme for “self-processing” into ethanol
presents potential risks to human health and is a totally unnecessary
development, given the huge amounts of existing corn already devoted to ethanol
production.
[9] “Who Benefits’ from GM crops: Feeding the biotech giants, not the world’s
poor” Friends of the Earth International. See note [2]