10% drop in genetically modified crops
grown in Europe
Brussels, 23 February
2010 – On the day of the release of annual industry-sponsored figures, a new report from Friends of the Earth
International reveals that claims made by the biotech industry that genetically
modified (GM) crops can combat climate change are both exaggerated and
premature. [1]
The report, ‘Who Benefits from GM Crops’, examines
the evidence for these claims, and exposes that GM crops could actually
increase carbon emissions while failing to feed the world. This is because GM
crops are responsible for huge increases in the use of pesticides in the US and South America, intensifying fossil fuel use. The cultivation of GM soy to feed factory farmed
animals is also contributing to widespread deforestation in South America. [2]
The report also exposes that globally GM
crops remain confined to less than 3% of agricultural land and more than 99%
are grown for animal feed and agrofuels, rather than food.
Ongoing concerns about the negative impacts of
GM crops means many Governments are still cautious about adopting them. India has placed a moratorium on the planting of its first GM food crop due to widespread
concerns on its health, environmental and socio-economic impact.
In Europe, the area planted with GM crops has
decreased for the fifth year in a row – a reduction of more than 10% since
2008. This reflects continuing public and political concerns on the negative impacts
of GM crops. In 2009, the EU’s largest member, Germany, became the sixth EU
country to ban the planting of GM maize, making the area planted in the EU with
GM crops less than 0.05% of total agricultural land. [3]
Friends of
the Earth Europe GM spokesperson Kirtana Chandrasekaran said, “The number of fields growing GM crops in Europe continues to dwindle while at the same time more and more Europeans are demanding
farming that benefits both people and the planet. European Governments would be
well advised to steer clear of GM crops in tackling climate change and put
their energies into boosting planet and people friendly farming instead.”
Despite many decades of research there is
still not a single commercial GM crop with increased yield, drought-tolerance,
salt-tolerance, enhanced nutrition or other beneficial traits long promised by
biotech companies. [4]
GM crops also hinder the development of real
solutions to hunger and climate change by starving them of funding and
restricting the access of farmers to seeds and knowledge. Ecological farming
and traditional knowledge have been identified as the key to facing future
challenges. [5]
Friends of
the Earth International food coordinator Martin Drago said, “GM crops are being promoted as
a solution to climate change, when in reality they are wiping out forests,
damaging farmers’ livelihoods and increasing harmful emissions. The reality is
that GM farming is not a success story. Small farmers across the world are
already using planet-friendly methods to feed themselves and cool the planet.
These methods must be supported rather than environmentally and socially
destructive GM farming.”
***
For more information please contact:
Kirtana Chandrasekaran, GM spokesperson for
Friends of the Earth Europe:
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7566 1669 and +44 (0) 79619 86956 (UK mobile)
Sam Fleet, Communications officer for Friends
of the Earth Europe:
Tel: +32 (0) 2 893 1012 and +32 (0) 470 072 049 (Belgian mobile) or
sam@foeeurope.org
For more information on the chain of destruction
stretching from factory farms in Europe to the forests of South America: http://www.feedingfactoryfarms.org/
***
NOTES
[1] The Friends of the Earth International
report launch comes one day ahead of the annual release of the 'Global Status
of Commercialized Biotech' report of the industry-sponsored International
Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) - which
promotes GM crops as a key solution to hunger and poverty.
‘Who Benefits from GM Crops’ http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/who_benefits_full_report_2010.pdf
[2] Recent US Department of Agriculture data
has shown that in 2008, GM crops in the US required over 26% more kilograms of
pesticides per hectare than conventional varieties. A 2007 study by a Brazilian
governmental agency found that the use of glyphosate increased 80 per cent from
2000 to 2005. In Argentina, more than two hundred thousand hectares of native
forest disappear every year, mainly due to the expansion of GM soy
plantations.
[3] Monsanto’s GM maize MON810 is the only GM
crops permitted for cultivation in Europe. Austria, France, Greece, Hungary, Poland and now Germany have banned MON810 on environmental and health grounds.
[4] 99% of biotech agriculture consists of
four crops with just two traits, herbicide-tolerance and/or insect-resistance.
The vast majority of GM crops in the pipeline are also herbicide tolerant or
insect resistant crops.
[5] UNEP, 2008 Organic Agriculture and Food
Security in Africa. See http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf